Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 13 Next »

Introduction

Those with ideas for future newsletter items should contact the LSST:UK Project Managers (George Beckett and Terry Sloanlusc_pm@mlist.is.ed.ac.uk), while everyone is encouraged to subscribe to the Rubin Observatory Digest for more general news from the US observatory team.

Bob Mann


Phase C funding outcome

Bob Mann


Dummy title for Tom, Tim and Dominic

Tom J Wilson , Tim Naylor and Dominic Sloan-Murphy


GalSim GPU Porting 

As part of Phase B WP3.10's contribution to DESC, I have been working on porting the GalSim sensor model to GPU over the past several months. GalSim is the low level library that forms the core of the ImSim image simulation code used extensively in DESC, and we have previously contributed various improvements to this library, including parallelising the main photon accumulation loop using OpenMP, and modifying how the sensor pixel geometry is stored.

I have added GPU acceleration to the photon accumulation and pixel boundary update loops using OpenMP Target Offload. This same technology is being used elsewhere in DESC's image simulation pipeline, and it meets DESC's requirement for a portable, platform-neutral GPU solution. It uses a directives-based approach requiring relatively little modification to the original C++ code. However, OpenMP Target Offload is still quite immature, and I encountered several problems (mostly compiler related) that had to be worked around. The porting work was done on NERSC's Perlmutter GPU system, though I am also now testing on Cirrus at EPCC, using the Clang compiler.

The porting is now complete and after debugging I am able to run the entire GalSim sensor test suite on GPU. The performance is better than expected, with the main accumulation loop running on average 3.9x faster on GPU than on CPU across all tests. However, when the photon arrays are already stored in GPU memory, this increases to 18x faster. The eventual aim is to integrate this work with other parts of the simulation workflow so that the photon data can be generated on the GPU and fed straight into the sensor model without ever having to leave GPU memory, and it appears that this may unlock a potentially large speed up.

James Perry


Recent LSST:UK Science Centre outputs

The LSST:UK Science Centre has recently produced the following technical reports.

Title

Author

Description

D3.6.1 Report/documentation on impact of observational effects and their spatial variability on photo-z, based on simulations

Qianjun Hang, Benjamin Joachimi (University College London)

The WP3.6 team investigated how different observational effects such as sky brightness, seeing, and number of exposures can affect the photometric redshift (photo-z) distribution for LSST. The observation strategy for Rubin is to cover a large survey region before building up the depth. During the first few years of observation, therefore, it is expected that the inhomogeneity in depth due to e.g. varying weather condition is large. Effectively, one can regard each pointing as a ‘mini’ survey with different observational systematics and limiting magnitudes. This could potentially be a problem for weak lensing analysis because the signal is sensitive to the mean redshift of the tomographic bin, especially for the precision required by LSST. In this investigation, the WP3.6 team focus on the ‘gold’ sample from the first (Y1) and fifth year (Y5) data release, for which the simulated observation conditions for the Rubin Observatory (OpSim) as well as the DC2 DM catalogue are used. We split the sample into tomographic binning for lens sample between 0.1 in 0.2 ≤ z ≤ 1.2 according to Y1 and Y5 requirements respectively. One of the main aims is to check whether the spatially varying observing conditions introduce fluctuations to the mean and scatter of each tomographic bins that are larger than the Rubin requirement. The photo-z is estimated using a template-fitting algorithm, BPZ lite. We find that for the sample with reduced photo-z outliers, the shifts in the mean redshift and the scatter in each tomographic bin is consistent with the random noise of the sample, and comparable to the Rubin requirement. Additionally, we also looked at the impact of spatially varying observational conditions in each band on the cModel magnitude, the magnitude error, colour, and galaxy over-density

Terry Sloan


Forthcoming meetings of interest

The first annoucement of the LSST@Europe 5 meeting has been made. The meeting will be held in Poreč, Croatia, during 25th--29th September 2023. Registration information is expected to be published by end of March 2023.

Meetings of potential interest for the coming months include:

  • 27th February – 3rd March: DESC Collaboration Meeting (virtual). Details to be published on DESC members website (login required).

  • 24th - 28th July: DESC Collaboration Meeting (SLAC).

Members of the Consortium (not in receipt of travel funding through one of the Science Centre grants) may apply for travel support for meetings of this kind via the the LSST:UK Pool Travel Fund. Details are available at Forthcoming LSST-related Meetings .

Note that the current list of forthcoming meeting is always available on the Relevant Meetings page. You may also wish to check information held on the LSST organisation website LSST-organised events and the LSST Corporation website.

George Beckett


Announcements

If you have significant announcements that are directly relevant to LSST:UK and would like to share the announcement in a future newsletter, please contact the LSST:UK project managers.

  • No labels